UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                            Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

GRACO INC.

88 Eleventh Avenue N.E.

Minneapolis, MN 55413

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

Dear Shareholder:

The 20182021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Graco Inc. will be held on April 27, 2018,23, 2021, beginning at 1:00 p.m. Central Time.We are pleased that thisTime.This year’s meeting will again be a completely virtual meeting of shareholders. Our virtual shareholder meeting format uses technology designed to increase shareholder access.access, save the Company and our shareholders time and money, and provide our shareholders with rights and opportunities to participate in the meeting similar to what they would have at an in-person meeting. In addition toon-line online attendance, we provide shareholders with an opportunity to hear all portions of the official meeting as conducted by the Chairman of the Board and the Secretary, submit written questions and comments during the meeting, and voteon-line online during the open poll portion of the meeting, and listen to live responses to shareholder questions by members of our Board of Directors or senior management team immediately following the formal portion of the meeting. You may attend the meeting, vote your shares and submit questions electronically during the meeting via live webcast by visitingwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GGG2018GGG2021. You will need the16-digit control number that is printed in the box marked by the arrow on your Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials to enter the annual meeting. We recommend that you log in at least fifteen15 minutes before the meeting to ensure you are logged in when the meeting starts.

At this meeting, shareholders will consider the following matters:

Shareholders of record at the close of business on February 26, 2018,22, 2021, are entitled to vote at this meeting or any adjournment.

We encourage you to join us via the Internet and vote at the meeting. Regardless of whether you plan on joining the meeting, we encourage you to vote by Internet, or by requesting a paper copy of the proxy card and voting by telephone or by returning your proxy card by mail, as described in further detail later in this Proxy Statement.

If you do not vote by Internet, telephone, returning a proxy card or voting your shares online during the meeting, you will lose your right to vote on matters that are important to you as a shareholder. Accordingly, please vote your shares in one of the methods identified above. Instructions on how to vote while participating in the meeting live via the Internet are posted atwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GGG2018.GGG2021.

Sincerely,
Patrick J. McHale		Karen Park Gallivan
President and Chief Executive Officer		Secretary
March 14, 201810, 2021
Minneapolis, Minnesota

1

Graco Inc. 20182021 Proxy Statement

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

Graco Inc. 20182021 Proxy Statement

GRACO INC.

88 Eleventh Avenue N.E.

Minneapolis, MN 55413

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD APRIL 27, 201823, 2021

Your proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors of Graco Inc. in connection with our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 27, 201823, 2021, and any adjournments of that meeting (the “Meeting”). Throughout this Proxy Statement, we may refer to Graco Inc. as “us,” “we,” “Graco,” “our Company” or “the Company.”

We have provided you with access to our proxy materials on the Internet. We are providing a Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to our shareholders of record and our beneficial owners. All shareholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials free of charge on the website identified in the Notice or request email or paper copies of the proxy materials. The Notice contains instructions on how to access the proxy materials through the Internet or request electronic or paper copies. If your shares are held by a broker, bank, broker-dealer or similar organization, you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” and the Notice will be forwarded to you by that organization. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct the organization holding your shares how to vote the shares.

The costs of the solicitation, including the cost of preparing and mailing the Notice, Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and this Proxy Statement, will be paid by us. Solicitation will be primarily through Internet availability of this Proxy Statement to all shareholders entitled to vote at the Meeting. Proxies may be solicited by our officers personally, but at no compensation in addition to their regular compensation as officers. We may reimburse brokers, banks and others holding shares in their names for third parties for the cost of forwarding proxy material to, and obtaining proxies from, third parties. The Notice will be mailed to shareholders on or about March 14, 2018,10, 2021, and the proxy materials will be available at that time on www.proxyvote.com.

Proxies may be revoked at any time prior to being voted by giving written notice of revocation to our Secretary.Secretary or by voting online during the meeting. All properly executed proxies received by management will be voted in the manner set forth in this Proxy Statement or as otherwise specified by the shareholder giving the proxy.

Shares voted as abstentions on any matter will be counted as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum at the Meeting, and as unvoted (although present and entitled to vote) for purposes of determining the approval of each matter as to which the shareholder has abstained. If a broker submits a proxy which indicates that the broker does not have discretionary authority as to certain shares to vote on one or more matters, those shares will be counted as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum at the Meeting, but will not be considered as present and entitled to vote with respect to such matters. The election of directors and the advisory vote on our executive compensation will be considered proposals on which your broker does not have discretionary authority to vote. Thus, if your shares are held in street name and you do not provide instructions as to how your shares are to be voted on these matters, your broker or other nominee will not be able to vote your shares in these matters. Accordingly, we urge you to provide instructions to your broker or nominee so that your votes may be counted on these matters. You should vote your shares by following the instructions provided on the voting instruction card that you receive from your broker.

The vote required for the election of directors in an uncontested election is a majority of votes cast, where the number of votes cast “for” a nominee exceeds the number of votes cast “against” a nominee. In a contested election, the vote required for the election of directors is a plurality of votes cast. In the event an incumbent director does not receive a sufficient number of the votes cast forre-election, our Corporate Governance Guidelines require that the director promptly offer to tender his or her resignation to the Board. The Governance Committee will make a recommendation to the Board on whether to accept or reject the offer. The Board, taking into account the recommendation of the Governance Committee, will decide whether to accept or reject the offer, and will publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it within 90 days after the date of the election. The vote required to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year 20182021 requires the approval of the greater of a majority of the shares present at the Meeting and entitled to vote, or a majority of the voting power of the minimum number of shares necessary to constitute a quorum. The vote on our executive compensation is advisory andnon-binding. However, the Board will consider shareholders to have approved our executive compensation if the number of the votes cast “for” that proposal exceeds the number of votes cast “against” that proposal. An abstention will have no effect on the election of directors or the vote on our executive compensation, but will have the effect of a vote against the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte and& Touche LLP.

4

Graco Inc. 20182021 Proxy Statement

Only shareholders of record as of the close of business on February 26, 201822, 2021, may vote at the Meeting. As of that date, there were 169,068,427168,906,052 issued and outstanding common shares of the Company, the only class of securities entitled to vote at the Meeting. Each share registered to a shareholder of record is entitled to one vote. Cumulative voting is not permitted.

VOTING METHODS

Registered shareholders may vote by using any one of the following methods:

You may visit www.proxyvote.com to vote your shares on the Internet, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, prior to 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time on April 26, 2018.22, 2021. Have your Notice or proxy card (if you have requested one) in front of you when you access the website, as they include information, including a unique shareholder control number, that is required to access the system.

You may request a paper proxy card by following the instructions on your Notice for requesting a copy of materials. After you receive your paper proxy card, you may call the toll-free phone number,1-800-690-6903, listed on your proxy card to vote your shares, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, prior to 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time on April 26, 2018.22, 2021. Have your proxy card or Notice in front of you when calling, as they include information, including a unique shareholder control number, which is required to access the system.

You may request a paper proxy card by following the instructions on your Notice for requesting a copy of materials. After you receive your paper proxy card, you may mark, date, and sign the proxy card, and return it to be received no later than April 26, 2018.22, 2021.

You may vote online during the Meeting through the link www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GGG2018.GGG2021. The16-digit control number provided on your Notice or proxy card is necessary to access this site. The Meeting will begin at 1:00 p.m. Central Time (with log-in beginning at 12:45 p.m. Central Time) on April 23, 2021.

If you own your shares through a broker, bank, broker-dealer or similar organization, you may vote by the methods made available to you through your broker. Follow the instructions describing the available processes for voting your stock that are provided to you by your broker.

ADDITIONAL MEETING INFORMATION

Shareholders of record at the close of business on February 22, 2021, may attend and participate in the Meeting. Shareholders will need to use their control number to log into the Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GGG2021.

We encourage you to access the Meeting prior to the start time. Please allow sufficient time for online check-in, which begins at 12:45 p.m. Central Time. You may check your browser’s compatibility any time prior to the Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GGG2021. If you experience any difficulties accessing the Meeting, please call (612) 623-6260 for assistance.

Shareholders who wish to submit questions may do so electronically before the Meeting (starting at the time of check-in) or during the Meeting. We will post any appropriate questions received during the Meeting and our answers on our Investor Relations website at https://investors.graco.com/webcast-presentation as soon as practical after the Meeting.

5

Graco Inc. 2021 Proxy Statement

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Nominees and Continuing Directors

The following information is given with respect to the fourthree nominees for election at the Meeting and the other sixseven directors whose terms of office will continue after the Meeting, and includes a description of the particular experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led the Board to conclude that each of the nominees and directors should serve as members of the Board. Except as noted below, each of the nominees and directors has held the same position, or another executive position with the same employer, for the past five years. One of our directors, Jack W. Eugster, reached age 75 in October 2020, and will therefore retire from our Board effective as of the Meeting in accordance with the retirement standards set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Further, as previously announced, Patrick J. McHale will retire as President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company effective June 10, 2021, and his successor, Mark W. Sheahan, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, will become President and Chief Executive Officer and a director effective June 10, 2021.

Nominees for election at the Meeting to terms expiring in 2021:2024:

William J. CarrollBrett C. Carter

Mr. Carroll, 73, wasCarter, 54, is Executive Vice President and Chief ExecutiveCustomer and Innovation Officer of Limo-Reid,Xcel Energy Inc. d/b/, a NRG Dynamix, a power train designermajor U.S. electric and manufacturer,natural gas delivery company. He assumed this position in May 2018. Prior to that, Mr. Carter served as Senior Vice President and Shared Services Executive of Bank of America from March 2009 until June 2011. Mr. Carroll has been a principal of Highland Jebco LLC, which provides advisoryOctober 2015 to May 2018, and consulting services to the automotive parts industry, since 2006. He was the Director of Economic and Community Development for the City of Toledo, Ohio from September 2004 until January 2006. From September 2003 to March 2004, Mr. Carroll wasas Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Dana Corporation, a manufacturerBank of America from March 2015 to October 2015. Before joining Bank of America, Mr. Carter held several leadership roles at Duke Energy Co. from 2005 to 2015, including most recently as Senior Vice President and supplier of components and systems for vehicular and industrial manufacturers worldwide. From 1997Chief Distribution Officer from 2013 to March 2004,2015. Mr. Carroll

5

Graco Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement

was President - Automotive Systems Group of Dana Corporation. Mr. CarrollCarter has been a director of Gracoour company since June 1999.February 2021. Among other qualifications, Mr. CarrollCarter brings to our Board a seasoned perspectivesubstantial experience overseeing key business areas of operations, marketing, information technology, cyber and comprehensive breadth of expertise on the automotive industry, a key market served by Graco, as well as considerable skill in financial, accountingphysical security, customer service and manufacturing oversight. Our Board recognizes this skill through its designation of Mr. Carroll as one of our audit committee financial experts and by his appointment as Chair of the Audit Committee.

Jack W. Eugster

Mr. Eugster, 72, was President and Chief Executive Officer of Musicland Stores Corporation, a retail music and home video company, from 1980 until his retirement in January 2001. He also served as Chairman of Musicland Stores from 1986 until his retirement. Mr. Eugster has been a director of Graco since February 2004. From 2004 until April 2016, he served as a director of Black Hills Corporation; from 2009 until June 2015, Mr. Eugster served as a director of Life Time Fitness, Inc.; from 1993 until November 2012, Mr. Eugster served as a director of Donaldson Company, Inc.; and from 2000 until 2007, he was a director of Golf Galaxy, Inc. From 1991 until 2005, Mr. Eugster served as a director of ShopKo Stores, Inc., and was Chairman of the Board from 2001 until 2005. Mr. Eugster also serves, or has served, as a director ofbrand strategy at several private companies, including Zone Mechanical Inc., where he has been a director since 2015, and Baker & Taylor, Inc., where he served as a director from 2008 until 2015. Among other qualifications, Mr. Eugster brings to our Board more than forty years ofmajor public company experience, including extensive experience as an executive and as a director. He has extensive knowledge of and expertise in finance and marketing, and is able to devote considerable attention to Company matters.companies.

R. William Van Sant

Mr. Van Sant, 79,82, has been a SpecialSenior Advisor at Yukon Partners II, LLC, a provider of mezzanine financing for middle-market private equity transactions, since July 2014, and an Operating Partner at TJM Capital Partners, an operationally-focused private equity firm, since 2015. He also serves as Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of Builtrite Holdings, LLC, a portfolio company of TJM Capital, and as a director of RIE Coatings, LLC, a portfolio company of Brass Ring Capital. In addition to actively advising private equity funds and their portfolio companies, Mr. Van Sant may from time to time take ownership interests in the funds and portfolio companies he advises. From December 2013 until June 2017, he was a Senior Operating Partner at Tenex Capital Management, L.P., a private equity firm, and from September 2012 until December 2013, he served as a Senior Advisor. During this time, he also served as the Chairman or as a director of several portfolio companies of Tenex. From January 2008 until February 2013, he was an Operating Partner of Stone Arch Capital, LLC, a private equity firm. From August 2006 through December 2007, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of Paladin Brands Holding, Inc., which manufactures attachments for construction equipment. From 2003 until August 2006, Mr. Van Sant was Chairman, and from 2003 until November 2005, he was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, of Paladin Brands, LLC. He was an operating partner with Norwest Equity Partners, a private equity firm, from 2001 through 2006. Mr. Van Sant has been a director of Graco since February 2004 and is also a director of H.B. Fuller Company. Among other qualifications, Mr. Van Sant is an expert in management, finance and manufacturing operations, experience he has acquired over many years as an executive and/or director of various manufacturing companies, including those listed above as well as Nortrax, Inc., Lukens Inc., Blount, Inc., and Cessna Aircraft Company. He also held roles of increasing responsibility over a nearly thirty year career at John Deere Company. Mr. Van Sant’s strong leadership experience and seasoned business valuation skills make him a key contributor to our Board on strategy and growth topics, particularly with respect to mergers and acquisitions. He has been designated by our Board as an audit committee financial expert.

Emily C. White

Ms. White, 39,42, is President of Anthos Capital LP, a venture capital and private equity firm specializing in growth capital investments. She assumed this position in September 2018. Ms. White was Chief Operating Officer at Snap Inc., a photo messaging company, from January 2014 through March 2015. Prior to joining Snap, Ms. White held several leadership roles at Facebook, Inc., a social networking company, from 2010 to 2013, including Head of Business Operations for Instagram, Senior Director of Mobile Business Development and Partnerships, and Senior Director of Local. Ms. White also held leadership roles at Google from 2001 to 2010. She has been a director of Graco since February 2018 and is also a director of lululemon athletica inc. andMs. White served as a director of Zayo Group Holdings Inc. Ms. Whitefrom April 2017 until March 2020. She is an advisor to Hyperloop One VSCO and Anthos Capital,VSCO, and serves on the Executive Advisory Council for the National Center for

6

Graco Inc. 2021 Proxy Statement

Women & Information Technology. Ms. White bringse-commerce and social media expertise to our Board as well as a wealth of business experience and judgment gained in her senior management positions at some of the world’s most successful technology companies.

6

Graco Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement

Directors whose terms continue until 2019:2022:

Eric P. Etchart

Mr. Etchart, 61,64, was Senior Vice President, Business Development of The Manitowoc Company, Inc., a manufacturer of cranes and foodservice equipment, from January 2015 until his retirement in January 2016. Mr. Etchart served as President of Manitowoc Cranes and Senior Vice President of The Manitowoc Company, Inc. from 2007 until January of 2015. From 2001 to 2007, Mr. Etchart was Executive Vice President, Asia Pacific and President, Zhang Jia Gang Company of the Manitowoc Crane Group, in Shanghai, China. Prior to that, Mr. Etchart held various management positions at Potain S.A., until it was acquired by Manitowoc in 2001, and at PPM Cranes S.A. Mr. Etchart has been a director of Graco since December 2010. He also serves as a director of Alamo Group Inc. and ofWD-40 Company, and is Chair of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee of Alamo Group Inc. and is Chair of the Corporate Governance Committee of WD-40 Company. Among other qualifications, Mr. Etchart brings to our Board over thirty years of global manufacturing experience, as well as extensive knowledge of and expertise in finance and marketing. Mr. Etchart, a French-national with over twenty years of experience in management positions outside of the U.S., including positions in China, Singapore, Italy, France and the Middle East, is particularly well-suited to provide an international perspective to the Board as we develop our business in global markets. Mr. Etchart was recognized asis a National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) Board Leadership Fellow in May 2016.Fellow.

Jody H. Feragen

Ms. Feragen, 62,65, was the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Hormel Foods Corporation, a multinational marketer and manufacturer of brand name food and meat products, from October 2010 until her retirement in October 2016. She served as Hormel’s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2007 to 2010, and as Vice President of Finance and Treasurer from 2005 to 2007. She also served on Hormel’s board of directors from 2007 until October 2016. Ms. Feragen is a director and Chair of the AuditFinance and Corporate Development Committee of Patterson Companies, Inc., and is a director of the University of North Dakota Alumni Association & Foundation, where she served as Chair from 2015 to 2017. Ms. Feragen has been a director of Graco since September 2015. Ms. Feragen brings to our Board a wealth of financial expertise, business acumen, strong leadership skills and extensive public company experience. She has been designated byOur Board recognizes this expertise, leadership and experience through its designation of Ms. Feragen as one of our Board as an audit committee financial expert.experts and by her appointment as Chair of the Audit Committee.

J. Kevin Gilligan

Mr. Gilligan, 63, is Chairman and66, was Chief Executive Officer of Capella Education Company, an online education provider.provider, from 2009 until August 2018. He also served as a director of Capella Education from 2009 until August 2018, and as Chairman from 2010 until August 2018. Mr. Gilligan served as Executive Vice Chairman of Strategic Education, Inc. from August 2018 until July 2019 in connection with its merger with Capella Education, and has served as Chief Executive OfficerVice Chairman of CapellaStrategic Education since March 2009, and as Chairman since February 2010.August 2019. Mr. Gilligan was President and Chief Executive Officer of United Subcontractors, Inc., a national construction services company, from October 2004 until February 2009. United Subcontractors voluntarily filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on March 31, 2009 and emerged from the bankruptcy proceedings on June 30, 2009. Mr. Gilligan was President and Chief Executive Officer, Automation and Control Solutions, Honeywell International, Inc., a diversified technology and manufacturing company, from 2001 until January 2004. Mr. Gilligan has been a director of Graco since February 2001 and is also a director of Capella Education Company.2001. From 2004 until 2009, Mr. Gilligan was a director of ADC Telecommunications, Inc., and served as lead director from 2008 until 2009. Among other qualifications, Mr. Gilligan brings to our Board over twenty-five years of global operational experience as well as comprehensive knowledge of the construction industry, one of the key industries Graco serves. Mr. Gilligan’s public company experience as both an executive and as a director provides additional depth to our Board’s leadership capabilities. Our Board recognizes this experience and leadership by his appointment as Chair of the Management Organization and Compensation Committee.

Directors whose terms continue until 2020:2023:

Patrick J. McHale

Mr. McHale, 56,59, is President and Chief Executive Officer of Graco Inc., a position he has held since June 2007. He served as Vice President and General Manager, Lubrication Equipment Division of Graco from June 2003 until June 2007. He was Vice President, Manufacturing and Distribution Operations from April 2001 until June 2003. He served as Vice President, Contractor Equipment Division from February 2000 to March 2001. Prior to becoming Vice President, Lubrication Equipment Division in September 1999, he held various manufacturing management positions in Minneapolis, Minnesota; Plymouth, Michigan; and Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Mr. McHale joined the Company in December 1989 and has been a director since June 2007. Mr. McHale has over twenty-seven thirty

7

Graco Inc. 2021 Proxy Statement

years of progressive experience in various manufacturing, sales and marketing roles while at Graco. He has extensive manufacturing experience andin-depth knowledge of financial and managerial accounting practices at Graco. Mr. McHale will be retiring as President and Chief Executive Officer and a director effective June 10, 2021.

7

Graco Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement

Lee R. Mitau

Mr. Mitau, 69,72, was Executive Vice President and General Counsel of U.S. Bancorp, the fifth-largest commercial bank in the United States by assets, from 1995 until his retirement in March 2013. Mr. Mitau has been a director of Graco since May 1990. He served as Chairman of the Board of the Company from May 2002 until April 2006 and has been serving as Chairman of the Board of the Company since June 2007. He also serves as Chairman of the Board of H.B. Fuller Company, a position he has held since 2006. Among other qualifications, Mr. Mitau brings to our Board extensive public company legal and governance expertise developed in his roles as an executive, a director and as the former chair of the corporate and securities practice of a global law firm. In addition, he is an expert in corporate finance and mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Mitau’s long service on our Board and hisin-depth knowledge of our business, combined with his leadership and corporate governance skills, make him particularly well-qualified to be our Chairman and Chair of our Governance Committee.

Martha A. Morfitt

Ms. Morfitt, 60,63, is President and Chief Executive Officer of River Rock Partners, Inc., a business and cultural transformation consulting firm. She assumed this position in 2008. Ms. Morfitt formerly served as Chief Executive Officer of Airborne, Inc., a manufacturer of dietary supplements, from 2009 through Marchuntil 2012. Ms. Morfitt left her position at Airborne effective March 30,in 2012 as a result of the acquisition of Airborne by Schiff Nutrition Group on March 30, 2012.Group. She also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of CNS, Inc., a manufacturer and marketer of consumer products, from 2001 through Marchuntil 2007. Ms. Morfitt left her position at CNS effective Marchin 2007 as a result of the acquisition of CNS by GlaxoSmithKline plc in December 2006.plc. Ms. Morfitt has been a director of Graco since October 1995 and is also a director of lululemon athletica inc andinc. From May 2017 until June 2020, Ms. Morfitt served as a director of Mercer International, Inc. From; from 2008 until June 2015, Ms. Morfittshe served as a director of Life Time Fitness, Inc.; from 1998 until 2007, she served as a director of CNS; from 2005 until 2006, she served as a director of Intrawest Corporation; and from 2007 until 2010, she served as a director of Solta Medical, Inc. f/k/a Thermage, Inc. Among other qualifications, Ms. Morfitt brings a wealth of global marketing and leadership skills to our Board. Her experience as CEO at River Rock Partners, Airborne and CNS, as well as her experience as a Vice President at Pillsbury Company, allow her to provide our Company with significant strategic and product marketing guidance. Ms. Morfitt’s long service on our Board and her considerable knowledge of our business make her well-suited to provide advice with respect to our strategic plans and marketing programs.

Kevin J. Wheeler

Mr. Wheeler, 61, is Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of A. O. Smith Corporation, one of the world’s leading manufacturers of residential and commercial water heating equipment and boilers, as well as a manufacturer of water treatment and air purification products. Mr. Wheeler was elected President and Chief Executive Officer effective September 2018, and before that served as President and Chief Operating Officer of A. O. Smith from June 2017 to August 2018. From 2013 to May 2017, Mr. Wheeler held the position of Senior Vice President of A. O. Smith and President and General Manager of its North America, India, Europe Water Heating and Export business, which was then A. O. Smith’s largest operating unit. Mr. Wheeler previously served as Managing Director of A. O. Smith’s European operations, where he had responsibility for its water heater business in Europe and the Middle East, and upon his return to the United States from the Netherlands, served as Vice President-International, with responsibility for all European and Asian operations, including China. Mr. Wheeler joined A. O. Smith in 1994, and has served as a director of A. O. Smith since July 2017 and as Chairman since May 2020. Mr. Wheeler has been a director of Graco since February 2020. Among other qualifications, Mr. Wheeler brings to our Board extensive sales, manufacturing and international experience, and his background as both an executive and a director of a public company provides additional depth to our Board’s leadership capabilities.

The Board appointed Mark W. Sheahan, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to the position of President and Chief Executive Officer effective June 10, 2021. The Board also appointed Mr. Sheahan to the class of directors whose terms expire at the 2023 annual meeting of shareholders. Mr. Sheahan, 56, became Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer in June 2018. He was Vice President and General Manager, AppliedFluid Technologies Division from 2008 until June 2018. He served as Chief Administrative Officer from 2005 until 2008, and was Vice President and Treasurer from 1998 to 2005. Prior to becoming Treasurer in 1996, he was Manager, Treasury Services. Mr. Sheahan joined the Company in 1995.

Qualification Standards

Our Company will only consider as candidates for director individuals who possess a high level of ethics integrity and values,integrity, and who are committed to representing the long-term interests of our shareholders. Such candidates must be able to make a significant

8

Graco Inc. 2021 Proxy Statement

contribution to the governance of our Company by virtue of their business and financial expertise, educational and professional background, and current or recent experience as a chief executive officer or other senior leader of a public company or other major organization. The business discipline that may be sought at any given time will vary depending on the needs and strategic direction of our Company and the disciplines represented by incumbent directors. In evaluating candidates for nomination as a director of Graco, the Governance Committee will also consider other criteria, including geographical representation, independence, practical wisdom, mature judgment and the ability of the candidate to represent the interests of all shareholders and not those of a special interest group. One or more of our directors is required to possess the education or experience required to qualify as an audit committee financial expert as defined in the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Once elected, all directors are subject to the standards set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which include, among others, the requirement to tender the director’s resignation if his or her employment status significantly changes, and the requirement to resign from the Board effective as of the date of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders next following the director’s 75^th birthday unless the director has current, substantial engagement in business activities that require skills relevant to Graco’s business and useful to the Board. In August 2017,2020, Mr. Van Sant reached age 79.82. At its September 20172020 meeting, the Board considered whether Mr. Van Sant had current, substantial engagement in business activities that require skills relevant to our Company’s business and useful to the Board. The Board once again unanimously determined that it would waive the mandated retirement of Mr. Van Sant, which waiver shallwill be reviewed annually, because Mr. Van Sant’s current and substantial engagement with private equity firms and their portfolio companies requires skills relevant to Graco’s business and useful to the Board.

The Governance Committee is responsible for the identification and recruitment of suitable prospective director candidates and has the sole authority to hire an outside search firm to identify director candidates. In 2020, Mr. Carter was identified and recommended for consideration as a director on our Board by an independent search firm retained by the Governance Committee. The Governance Committee may retain an outside search firm as a resource for future candidate sourcing and succession planning as the Governance Committee deems

8

Graco Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement

appropriate. In 2017, Ms. White was identified and recommended for consideration as a director on our Board by one of ournon-employee directors.

Qualifications of Current Directors

All of our directors meet the qualification standards and expectations described above. In addition to possessing a high level of ethics, integrity and values, excellent judgment and a commitment to representing the long-term interests of our shareholders, each of our directors brings a particular set of skills and experience that enable him or her to make a significant contribution to the governance of our Company.

Board Diversity

In considering whether to recommend an individual for election to our Board, the Governance Committee considers diversity of experience, geographical representation, gender and race, in addition to the other qualifications described in the “Qualification Standards” section above. The Committee views diversity expansively and considers, among other things, functional areas of business and financial expertise, educational and professional background, and those competencies that it deems appropriate to develop a cohesive Board such as ethics, integrity, values, practical wisdom, mature judgment and the ability of the candidate to represent the interests of all shareholders and not those of a special interest group.

Our Board of Directors and each of its committees engage in an annual self-evaluation process. As part of that process, directors, including our President and Chief Executive Officer, provide feedback on, among other things, whether the Board has the right set of skills, diversity, experience and expertise. This evaluation encompasses a consideration of diversity as described above.

Nominee Selection Process

The selection process for director candidates reflects guidelines established from time to time by the Governance Committee. A shareholder seeking to recommend a prospective candidate for the Governance Committee’s consideration should submit such recommendation in writing, addressed to the Governance Committee in care of the Secretary of the Company at our Company’s corporate headquarters.

To nominate a director, our bylaws provide that timely notice must be received by the Secretary not less than 90 days prior to the anniversary of the date of our Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The nominations must set forth: (i) the name, age, business and residential addresses and principal occupation or employment of each nominee proposed in such notice; (ii) the name and address of the shareholder giving the notice and any beneficial owner on whose behalf the nomination is made, as they appear in our Company’s stock register; (iii) the number of shares of capital stock of our Company which are beneficially owned by, or any other direct or indirect interest in the capital stock of our Company held by, each such nominee and such shareholder; and (iv) such other information concerning each such nominee as would be required under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission in a proxy statement soliciting proxies for the election of such nominee. Such notice must also include a signed

9

Graco Inc. 2021 Proxy Statement

consent of each such nominee to serve as a director of our Company, if elected. Shareholder nominees will be evaluated in the same manner as nominees from other sources.

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Carroll,Carter, Mr. Etchart, Mr. Eugster, Ms. Feragen, Mr. Gilligan, Mr. Mitau, Ms. Morfitt, Mr. Van Sant, Mr. Wheeler and Ms. White are independent directors. The independent directors constitute a majority of the Board, and the only director who is not independent is Mr. McHale, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer. In making its determination regarding the independence of the directors, our Board noted that each independent director meets the standards for independence set out in the New York Stock Exchange corporate governance rules, and that there is no material business relationship between our Company and any independent director, including any business entity with which any independent director is affiliated.

In making its determination, our Board reviewed information provided by each of the independent directors and information gathered by our management, and determined that none of the independent directors, other than Mr. Carter, have any relationship with our Company other than as a director and shareholder.

9

Graco The Board specifically considered that Mr. Carter serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Customer and Innovation Officer of Xcel Energy Inc. 2018 Proxy StatementIn 2020, our Company paid Xcel Energy approximately $4.2 million for electric services to some of our facilities in Minnesota and South Dakota. Xcel Energy did not provide any advisory services to the Company. Our relationship with Xcel Energy predates Mr. Carter’s service on our Board, and Mr. Carter has never been personally involved in any way in our transactions or relationship with Xcel Energy. The total amount our Company paid to Xcel Energy in 2020 falls significantly below two percent of Xcel Energy’s 2020 gross revenues, which is the threshold for determining independence under the New York Stock Exchange’s independence standards. The Board determined that neither the nature of the relationship between Xcel Energy and our Company nor the amount of payments was material to either the Company or Xcel Energy, and that Mr. Carter does not have a material interest in the foregoing transactions because he was not directly involved in the transactions and he does not derive any special benefit related to the transactions.

BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide for the position of Chairman of the Board of Directors, who may or may not be the same person who serves as our President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Mitau has served as our independent Chairman of the Board from May 2002 until April 2006 and again since June 2007. Our Board currently believes that separating the roles of Chairman of the Board and CEO is appropriate for our Company because in the wake of difficult or volatile economic times such as those experienced during the economic recession of the late 2000’s, it is desirable to have our CEO focused on the management and operation of our business without the additional responsibilities of Chairman. Moreover, Mr. Mitau has significant public company and governance experience. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines set forth several responsibilities of the Chairman of the Board, including setting agendas for board meetings and presiding at executive sessions ofnon-employee directors.

BOARD OVERSIGHT OF RISK

Our Board of Directors takes an active role in oversight of our Company’s risk by assessing risks inherent in our Company’s decisions and key strategies. The Audit Committee specifically discusses policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management as part of its responsibility to oversee our Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee actively oversees the Company’s cybersecurity risks and strategy, with management providing regular reports to the Audit Committee and the Board on cybersecurity risks facing the Company and the systems management has put in place to identify, mitigate and manage those risks.

Our Company engages in an Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) process. The ERM process consists of periodic risk assessments performed by each division, region and functional group during the year, including an annual risk assessment on the Company’s executive compensation program as(as discussed in more detail on page 18.19) and an annual assessment of the Company’s cybersecurity risks. Executive management periodically reviews the divisional, regional and functional risk assessments. These assessments are presented to the Audit Committee each September to ensure completeness, appropriate oversight and review. We believe that the active oversight role played by our Audit Committee, which consists solely of independent directors, provides the appropriate level of independent oversight of risk within our Company.

10

Graco Inc. 2021 Proxy Statement

MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

During 2017,2020, our Board of Directors met five times. Attendance of our directors at all Board and committee meetings averaged 97%99%. During 2017,2020, every director attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and all committees of the Board on which he or she served. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require that each director make all reasonable efforts to attend the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders. In 2017,2020, all of the directors attended the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, other than one director who was unable to attend due to a family medical emergency.Shareholders. Each regularly scheduled meeting of the Board includes an executive session of onlynon-employee directors. Mr. Mitau, Chairman of the Board, presides at the executive sessions.

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors has an Audit Committee, a Governance Committee, and a Management Organization and Compensation Committee. Membership as of February 26, 2018,22, 2021, the record date, was as follows:

Mr. Carter was appointed to serve as a member of the Audit Committee and the Management Organization and Compensation Committeeupon his appointment to the Board effective February 11, 2021.

10

Graco Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement

Audit Committee(8 (8 meetings in fiscal year 2017)2020)

The Audit Committee is composed entirely of directors who meet the independence requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All of the Audit Committee members are, in the judgment of the Board, financially literate. Our Board has determined that Mr. Carroll, Ms. Feragen and Mr. Van Sant are audit committee financial experts.

The Audit Committee assists the Board in its oversight of the integrity of our financial statements, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the qualification and independence of the independent auditor, and the performance of the internal audit function and the independent auditors.

The responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in a written charter. The Audit Committee has reviewed and reassessed the adequacy of its charter and concluded that the charter satisfactorily states the responsibilities of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee Charter was most recently approved by the Board on February 16, 2018.

Governance Committee(4 (4 meetings in fiscal year 2017)2020)

The Governance Committee is composed entirely of directors who meet the independence requirements of the New York Stock Exchange. The Governance Committee has the following functions:

The responsibilities of the Governance Committee are fully set forth in its written charter, which was most recently approved by the Board on February 16, 2018.

11

Graco Inc. 2021 Proxy Statement

Management Organization and Compensation Committee(3 (3 meetings in fiscal year 2017)2020)

The Management Organization and Compensation Committee is composed entirely of directors who meet the independence requirements of the New York Stock Exchange. The Management Organization and Compensation Committee has the following functions:

The responsibilities of the Management Organization and Compensation Committee are fully set forth in its written charter, which was most recently approved by the Board on February 16, 2018.14, 2020.

11

Graco Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

None of the members of the Board who served on the Management Organization and Compensation Committee during 20172020 has ever been an officer or employee of our Company or any of its subsidiaries.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Anon-employee director may elect to receive shares of our common stock instead of cash for all or part of the director’s annual retainers. A director may choose to receive the shares currently or defer receipt until the director leaves the Board, at which time the director may receive the shares in a lump sum or installments. Payments, whether in a lump sum or by installments, will be made in shares of common stock, plus cash in lieu of any fractional share. When our Board declares a dividend, the director’s deferred stock account is credited with additional shares of deferred stock in an account held by a trustee in the name of thenon-employee director equivalent to the number of shares that could be purchased with the dividends at the current fair market value of the shares.

12

Graco Inc. 2021 Proxy Statement

Non-employee directors receive an annual option grant. In 2017,2020, non-employee directors received an annual option grant of 12,87013,770 shares (as adjusted for thethree-for-one split of the Company’s stock on December 27, 2017) on the date of the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The number of shares granted was based on a split-adjusted Black-Scholes value of $9.70$9.44 per share on April 28, 2017,23, 2020, and an economic value of approximately $125,000.$130,000. At its September 2020 meeting, our Governance Committee changed the date on which non-employee directors receive their annual option grant to align with the date on which our executive officers and key employees receive their annual option grant. Thus, on February 12, 2021, non-employee directors received an annual option grant of 7,360 shares. The number of shares granted was based on a Black-Scholes value of $17.66 per share on February 11, 2021, and an economic value of approximately $130,000. Upon first joining the Board,non-employee directors are also eligible to receive an initial option grant with an economic value equal to that of the most recent option grant fornon-employee directors. There were no first-timenon-employee director appointments in 2017.Mr. Wheeler received an initial option grant of 11,750 shares on February 28, 2020, upon his appointment to the Board. The number of shares granted to Mr. Wheeler was based on a Black-Scholes value of $10.63 on February 27, 2020, and an economic value of approximately $125,000. Mr. Carter received an initial option grant of 7,360 shares on February 11, 2021, upon his appointment to the Board. The number of shares granted to Mr. Carter was based on a Black-Scholes value of $17.64 on February 10, 2021, and an economic value of approximately $130,000. Options granted tonon-employee directors are issued under the Graco Inc. 20152019 Stock Incentive Plan.Plan (the “Plan”). The options arenon-statutory, have a10-year duration and become exercisable in equal installments over four years, beginning with the first anniversary of the date of the grant. The option exercise price is the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant, as defined in the Plan. The Plan defines “fair market value” as the last saleclosing sales price of the stock as reported byon the New York Stock Exchangeprincipal securities market on which it trades on the date immediately prior topreceding the date of grant.

Our Board’s philosophy is to target retainer compensation at a level approximately comparable to the median of the market, and to target equity compensation in the form of stock options at a level approximately comparable to the 75^th percentile of the market, in order to attract and retain capable Board members, to encourage above-market Company performance, and to strengthen the link between our director compensation program and the interests of our shareholders in Graco stock performance.

Our Governance Committee requested that the Graco Compensation Departmentretained Willis Towers Watson to conduct a peer group comparison of director compensation and present such data at its February 20172020 meeting. The peer companies selectedused for the comparison2020 benchmarking study matched the peer group identified for executive compensation on page 2023 of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of the Proxy Statement for the 20172020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. In reviewing the peer group comparison, the Governance Committee concluded that annual committee chair retainerstotal director cash compensation fell below the median of the peer group, and director equity compensation fell below the 75^th percentile of the peer group. As a result, the Board of Directors, upon recommendation of the Governance Committee, determined that, effective May 1, 2017,2020, the annual committee retainer for the Chair of the GovernanceAudit Committee willwould increase from $7,500$10,000 to $10,000,$12,500, the annual committee retainer for the Chair of the Management Organization and Compensation Committee willwould increase from $10,000$5,000 to $12,500,$7,500, and the annual committee retainer for the Chair of the

12

Graco Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement

AuditGovernance Committee willwould increase from $15,000$5,000 to $20,000. No other adjustments were made to$6,000. The Board of Directors, upon recommendation of the Governance Committee, further determined that, effective immediately, the economic value of the next annual option grant for each non-employee directors’ compensation.director would increase from $125,000 to $130,000. As a result of the foregoing adjustments, non-employee director cash and equity compensation were approximately at the 50^th and 75^th percentiles of the peer group, respectively.

Our Governance Committee requested that the Graco Compensation Department conduct a peer group comparison of director compensation and present such data at its February 20182021 meeting. The peer companies selected for the comparison matched the peer group identified for executive compensation on page 2122 of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement. In reviewing the peer group comparison, the Governance Committee concluded that its current retainer compensation is approximately at the median of the peer group, and that its equity compensation is approximately at the 75^th percentile of the peer group, so no changes were proposed for 2018.2021.

Share ownership guidelines for our directors require each of ournon-employee directors to own a minimum of approximately five times the total value of their annual retainer and meeting feesretainers in Company stock. Shares of common stock directly and beneficially owned, as well as phantomdeferred stock shares, are used to calculate each director’s ownership level; stock options are not used. Directors have five years from their initial date of appointment to reach the minimum ownership level. All of our directors who have served for at least five years exceed this ownership requirement.

In February 2001, our Board terminated the retirement benefit fornon-employee directors, which provided that, upon cessation of service, anon-employee director who has served for five full years or more will receive payments for five years at a rate equal to the director’s annual retainer in effect on the director’s last day of service on the Board. The annual retainer calculation is set at the rate then in effect for thenon-Chairman annual retainer and does not include Committee Chair retainer fees. Such retirement payments will be prorated and made quarterly. Payments will be made in accordance with this retirement benefit to Mr. Mitau and Ms. Morfitt upon their respective retirements.

13

Graco Inc. 2021 Proxy Statement

Director Compensation Table for Fiscal Year Ended December 29, 2017.25, 2020

The following table summarizes the total compensation paid to or earned by ournon-employee directors for their service during the fiscal year ended December 29, 2017:25, 2020:

13

Graco Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DOCUMENTS

The charters of the Audit, Governance, and Management Organization and Compensation Committees, as well as our Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, are available on our website at www.graco.com and may be found by selecting the “Investors”“For Investors” tab and then clicking on “Corporate Governance.”

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

Report of the Audit Committee

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements of our Company for the fiscal year ended December 29, 201725, 2020 (the “Financial Statements”) with both the Company’s management and its independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP. The Audit Committee has discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board standards.and the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our management has represented to the Audit Committee that the Financial Statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The Audit Committee has received from Deloitte & Touche LLP the written disclosure and the letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee has discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP its independence. The Audit Committee has also received written material addressing Deloitte & Touche LLP’s internal quality control procedures and other matters, as required by the New York Stock Exchange listing standards. The Audit Committee has considered the effect ofnon-audit fees on the independence of Deloitte & Touche LLP and has concluded that suchnon-audit services are compatible with the independence of Deloitte & Touche LLP.

Based on these reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that the Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2017,25, 2020, be included in the Company’s 20172020 Annual Report on Form10-K for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

1516

Graco Inc. 20182021 Proxy Statement

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees and Services

The following table sets forth the aggregate audit fees incurred by Graco Inc. and its subsidiaries from our Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, the member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu and their respective affiliates (collectively, the “Deloitte Firms”), and the fees paid to the Deloitte Firms for services in the other fee categories during the fiscal years ended December 29, 201725, 2020, and December 30, 2016.27, 2019. The Audit Committee has considered the scope and fee arrangements for all services provided by the Deloitte Firms to our Company, taking into account whether the provision ofnon-audit services is compatible with maintaining the Deloitte Firms’ independence. The Audit Committeepre-approved 100% of the services described below.

Pre-Approval Policies

The Audit Committee’s policy on approval of services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm is topre-approve all audit and permissiblenon-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm during the fiscal year. The Audit Committee reviews eachnon-audit service to be provided and assesses the impact of the service on the firm’s independence.

1617

Graco Inc. 20182021 Proxy Statement

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Overview

In 2017,2020, the Company achieved record levels of sales and increased its dividend while continuingcontinued to invest in its four core strategies for growth and long-term value creation: new product development; new markets; global expansion; and acquisitions. During the year, net sales were $1.475$1.65 billion (up 11% from 2016)(flat with 2019), diluted net earnings per share (“EPS”) were $1.45 (up 504%$1.92 (down 4% from 2016)2019), and dividends paid per share were $0.48$0.70 (up 9%9.4% from 20162019 - our 1821^thst consecutive annual increase). Net earnings in 2016 included anon-cash impairment charge of $192, and share repurchases totaled $102 million ($161 million after tax effects) ($0.94 per diluted share) related to assets of businesses acquired in 2014 and 2015 that have significant exposure to oil and natural gas markets.million. Total shareholder return during the period was 65%40%. The Company’s short-term cash incentive plan continued to use net sales and EPS asDespite the sole metrics to reward top and bottom-line performance. The EPS metrics used for 2017 were adjusted to exclude certain unusual items as defined byimpact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global economy, the Management Organization and Compensation Committee (for purposes of this Executive Compensation section, the “MOCC”), did not make any changes to the performance targets or plan designs for the Company’s incentive programs. The Company’s short-term cash incentive plan continued to use net sales and earnings per share as the sole metrics to reward top- and bottom-line performance. The earnings per share metrics used for 2020 were adjusted to exclude certain items as defined by the MOCC as described in more detail on pages 23 andpage 24, which we refer to as “Adjusted“Incentive EPS.” Accordingly, the Adjusted EPS in this Proxy Statement differ from the adjusted EPS reported in our earnings release. For 2017, Adjusted2020, Incentive EPS were $1.46.$2.01. The following charts detail the Company’s net sales and AdjustedIncentive EPS results against targets and prior year performance.

The Company’s named executive officers (“Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs”) for 20172020 were:

Consideration of“Say-on-Pay” Voting Results

The MOCC targets a competitive and equitable executive compensation program that rewards executives based upon Company (or, in some cases,and individual performance, and for certain executives, region or division) and individual performance.division performance as well. In making executive compensation decisions, the MOCC considers the results of the most recent advisory,non-binding vote on the compensation paid to our NEOs. At the Annual Meeting of Shareholders in April of 2016,2019, our shareholders approved the compensation paid to our NEOs by over 94%93%. The MOCC believes this favorable outcome reflects our shareholders’ strong support of the Company’s executive compensation philosophy, program and practices. As a result, the MOCC determined it was not necessary to make any material changes to the Company’s executive compensation program for 2017.2020. Our executive compensation received nearly 93%91% support at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders in April of 2017.

Compensation Philosophy

Compensation Risk Assessment

The Company’s Internal Audit Department conducts an annual risk assessment on the Company’s executive compensation program and presents its findings to the MOCC and the Audit Committee. The risk assessment identifies, among other things, certain potential risks in the Company’s short- and long-term incentive plans and the Company’s severance and change of control arrangements, and various factors that serve to mitigate those risks. Such mitigating factors include those set forth above, as well as the annual plan design and benchmarking review by the independent compensation consultant and the MOCC, the MOCC’s review and approval of incentive awards, the Company’s internal controls, and the use of “double-triggers” in severance and change of control arrangements. At its September 20172020 meeting, the MOCC reviewed and discussed the risk assessment and determined that the Company’s executive compensation program is not likely to have a material adverse impact on the Company, and recommended that the Audit Committee make the same determination as well. As a result, the MOCC did not make any changes to the Company’s executive compensation program.

1819

Graco Inc. 20182021 Proxy Statement

Executive Officer Compensation Processes

The MOCC uses the following resources, processes and procedures to help it effectively perform its responsibilities:

Executive Compensation Consultant

The MOCC has the authority under its charter to engage the services of outside consultants, to determine the scope of the consultants’ services and to terminate such consultants’ engagement. The MOCC retained Willis Towers Watson as its independent outside executive compensation consultant to advise the MOCC on matters relating to the determination of base salary, short-term incentive and long-term incentive programs for the Company’s executive officers.

In its capacity as the executive compensation consultant, Willis Towers Watson advises the MOCC on the following matters:

Our Company’s management engaged Willis Towers Watson to perform certainnon-executive compensation services in 2017.2020. The total fees for these services were less than $120,000.

The MOCC reviews the independence of the executive compensation consultant on an annual basis. In evaluating Willis Towers Watson’s independence, the MOCC considers all factors relevant to Willis Towers Watson’s independence from management, including the following:

Based on its review, the MOCC concluded there was no conflict of interest that impaired Willis Towers Watson’s independence.

Role of Management in Executive Compensation Decisions

Our management is involved in the following executive compensation processes:

Benchmarking

The MOCC annually retains Willis Towers Watson to provide survey market data of companies with similar revenues for all executive officer positions, with a focus on the manufacturing industry. The MOCC meets in the fall of each year to review this market data. The market data is derived from Willis Towers Watson’s database and is statistically adjusted to reflect variation in revenues among the companies. The MOCC is presented with data showing total direct compensation amounts at the 50^th and 75^th percentiles of the market data. In addition, the MOCC considers data from this survey reflecting the general mix of compensation elements among base salary, short-term incentives and long-term incentives. At the same time, the MOCC reviews information showing the relative positioning of the compensation of the Company’s executive officers in relation to the market data. When reviewing the relative positioning of each executive officer’s total direct compensation level, the MOCC compares each executive officer to generally comparable positions identified within the market data. The purpose of this annual review is to gather a general sense for whether the Company’s compensation levels and mix of compensation elements are generally consistent with this market data, with a general expectation that total direct compensation should be between the 50^th and the 75^th percentiles of the market data depending on Company and individual performance. At the same time, Willis Towers Watson provides general information to the MOCC about market trends and expected compensation level changes for the upcoming fiscal year (“Market Increase Projection”).

At the MOCC’s last meeting of each fiscal year, the MOCC sets base salaries for executive officers for the upcoming fiscal year. The decisions about the specific base salary levels are based on individual performance and budgetary constraints, and are guided by the 50^th percentile of the market data without a specific market position targeted.

At the MOCC’s first meeting of each fiscal year, the MOCC approves short-term incentive targets and long-term incentive awards. The target short-term cash award is determined as a percentage of base salary for the executive officer annual incentive plan, which percentage has been consistent for severalmany years. The MOCC targets the value of the long-term incentive awards for the NEOs at the 75^th percentile for comparable positions within the Willis Towers Watson database, although the number of shares granted may be adjusted downward based on the Company’s stock dilution guidelines and internal equity. The reason for targeting the 75^th percentile is to encourage above-market performance. In addition, the MOCC believes that the opportunity for

20

Graco Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement

above-market compensation should be primarily earned in the area of long-term performance. Once the value of the long-term incentive award is determined, the number of shares subject to the equity awards granted to each executive officer is determined

21

Graco Inc. 2021 Proxy Statement

by dividing the long-term incentive award value by a projected Black-Scholes value based on assumptions used for financial accounting purposes.

Refer to the discussions of each compensation element below, as well as the “Compensation of Individual Named Executive Officers” section below, for specific information on how this benchmarking process applied to specific compensation decisions for our NEOs for 2017.2020.

Our Company’s Peer Group

The MOCC andCompany’s peer group (the “Graco Peer Group”) was updated in 2019 with the assistance of Willis Towers Watson reviewedto ensure the group is large enough to maintain reliable market outcomes and analyzed the Graco Peer Group in 2016. Based on that review and analysis, the MOCC determined not to make any changes to the Graco Peer Group, believing the Graco Peer Group is appropriately aligned with the Company in terms of industry, size, life cycle stage, labor market, and revenue and market capitalization characteristics. The following table lists the companies that were in the Graco Peer Group when the MOCC set 20172020 compensation levels for the executive officers, and includes financial and headcount data for the Company and the median of the Graco Peer Group:

(1)    Represents most recent fiscal year data available from Equilar as of January 25, 2021.

Given that compensation data for the CEO and CFO positions of the Graco Peer Group are readily available in securities filings, the MOCC used the applicable Graco Peer Group as a primary source of data when setting 20172020 and 2021 compensation levels for the Company’s CEO and CFO. Compensation data for all other executive officer positions in the Graco Peer Group are limited to those executive officers identified in securities filings, which positions may or may not correspond to the positions held by, and responsibilities of, our other executive officers. Therefore, the MOCC used the Willis Towers Watson survey data as a primary source of data, and the relevant Graco Peer Group as a secondary source of data to the extent applicable, when setting 20172020 and 2021 compensation levels for the Company’s other executive officers.

2122

Graco Inc. 20182021 Proxy Statement

Components of the Executive Compensation Program

Our executive compensation program is designed to reward short-term results and motivate long-term performance through the use of three primary total compensation components: base salary; short-term incentives; and long-term incentives. The following table summarizes each of these components of compensation:

In addition to reviewing the benchmark data described above, the MOCC reviews compensation and benefits tally sheets for our projected NEOs showing their current and potential total compensation and benefits components. The tally sheets also display estimated compensation and benefits for hypothetical change of control and involuntary and voluntary terminations. Specifically, the tally sheets reviewed by the MOCC in September 20172020 provided actual compensation for 20152018 and 20162019 and target annual compensation for 2017.2020. These tally sheets also provided retirement balances as of December 31, 2016,2019, projected to normal retirement age or the age at which the benefit is not subject to reduction, deferred compensation balances and the projected value of stock awards based on assumptions regarding stock price appreciation.

The MOCC strives to maintain a reasonable and competitive balance between fixed and variable elements of compensation. The MOCC believes the compensation mix and amount paid to each of our executive officers is market-based, reasonable and competitive. The 20172020 pay mix at target for our CEO and other NEOs is displayed below. The percentage allocation among each pay element may vary based on an individual’s experience, responsibilities, performance and corporate/division/region results. The “at risk” pay components comprised between 65%63% and 86%88% of the total target annual direct compensation for 20172020 to align our NEOs’ compensation with the performance of the Company and the creation of shareholder value.

 

2223

Graco Inc. 20182021 Proxy Statement

Base Salary

Base salary is fixed compensation. Annual salary increases are based on individual performance and budgetary constraints, and are guided by the 50^th percentile market data.

For 2017,2020, the merit increase decisions for the NEOs were based on the criteria identified above. Additional information on individual salary adjustments for 20172020 is provided in the “Compensation of Individual Named Executive Officers” section below.

Short-Term Incentives (STI)

The Graco Inc. Incentive Bonus Plan (the “Incentive Bonus Plan”) is designed to motivate the executive officers of the Company to improve the overall performance of the Company and to reward them when the Company achieves specific measurable results. The Incentive Bonus Plan provides cash rewards to executive officers to encourage them to produce a strong return for the Company’s shareholders and to encourage them to remain employees of the Company. The Incentive Bonus Plan gave the MOCC discretion to grant awards that qualified as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (prior to the recent tax reform legislation that repealed the exemption for performance-based compensation), as well as awards that are not intended to so qualify. The MOCC has the discretion to designate executive officers and other employees of the Company as participants in the Incentive Bonus Plan. The Incentive Bonus Plan also permits the MOCC to establish performance periods based on a performance period of any length. Potential payouts under the Incentive Bonus Plan are expressed as a percentage of base salary, which percentages have remained constant within each level (CEO and other executive officers) for severalmany years. Specific financial performance thresholds must be attained in order for the executive officers to earn an incentive payment. If specified performance levels are not achieved or exceeded, there is no payout. The annual incentives, to the extent earned, are typically paid in cash in March following the calendaryear-end and are based upon the MOCC’s determination of financial performance againstpre-established targets.

At its meeting in February 2017,2020, the MOCC approved participation of the CEO and other executive officers in the Incentive Bonus Plan for 2017.2020. The threshold, target and maximum payout levels as a percent of target and as a percent of base salary for 20172020 are displayed below. Achievement of performance levels between threshold and target, and target and maximum, result in a payout that is interpolated based on the level of performance, and permit a partial payout as soon as the threshold level of achievement has been exceeded.

The MOCC established two financial measures for the Incentive Bonus Plan: net sales and Incentive EPS growth over the prior year. Net sales and Incentive EPS growth were selected as the metrics against which to measure the executive officers’ performance for the Incentive Bonus Plan because the MOCC desires to motivate the officers to achieve profitable business growth consistent with our long-term financial objectives. The MOCC utilized projected global gross domestic product (“GDP”)(GDP) growth rates as a guide in setting the 20172020 target performance levels. At the time the MOCC established the 20172020 target performance levels, the MOCC once again determined that final bonus payout calculations for corporate, worldwide division and region Incentive EPS would exclude certain purchase accounting andone-time transaction costs related to acquisitions and divestitures, the initial valuation of acquisitions and potential earn out adjustments, and the effects of changes in accountingexcess tax benefits from stock option exercises. Final Incentive EPS calculations for stock compensation. In calculating final 20172020 bonus payouts the MOCC elected todid exclude from the EPS calculation certain purchase accounting andone-time transaction costs related to acquisitions, the initial valuation of certain acquisitions, certain acquisition earn out adjustments, and the effects of changes in accounting for stock compensation. The MOCC also elected to exclude the impacts of pension plan restructuring in

23

Graco Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement

2017, U.S. federal income tax reform passed at the end of 2017, and tax planning and othernon-recurring tax charges in 2017.these items. The MOCC believes these adjustments provide a better measure of operating performance in 2017. As a result,2020. In addition to these recurring adjustments, the Adjusted EPS resultsMOCC has the authority to adjust Incentive Bonus Plan awards based on unanticipated or special circumstances. Despite the impact of $1.46 are slightly higher than the adjusted EPS reported in our earnings release.COVID-19 pandemic on the global economy, the MOCC elected not to make any adjustments to performancetargets, bonus payouts or the design of the Incentive Bonus Plan.

The 20172020 incentive award payouts were based upon the achievement of specified levels of net sales and AdjustedIncentive EPS at the

24

Graco Inc. 2021 Proxy Statement

corporate and division/region levels. Financial performance levels and actual results for the 20172020 Incentive Bonus Plan were as follows:

interests in creating long-term shareholder value. The MOCC has utilized stock options as the sole long-term incentive vehicle for the executive officer compensation program for 27 years. Over the past 27 years, the Company’s cumulative total shareholder return has been 11,442% versus 694% for the S&P 500 and 704% for the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Assuming all dividends were reinvested, a $1,000 investment in the Company’s common stock at the beginning of the 27-year period would have been worth $115,423 on December 25, 2020, while a $1,000 investment in each of the S&P 500 Index and the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index would have been worth $7,939 and $8,045, respectively, on December 25, 2020. The MOCC does not believe that changing the design of the long-term incentive program at this time would motivate our executive officers to create long-term shareholder value more effectively than the current design.

Under the terms of the Graco Inc. 20152019 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2015“2019 Plan”), the MOCC must approve all stock option grants to executive officers. In February 2017,2020, executive officers were awardednon-qualified stock options with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date, defined in the 20152019 Plan as the last sale price of the stock on the day immediately preceding the grant date. Each option has a10-year term and becomes exercisable in equal installments over four years, beginning with the first anniversary of the grant date. Additionally, the 20152019 Plan prohibits the repricing of stock options.

In 2017,2020, the MOCC granted the following stock option awards to the NEOs under the 20152019 Plan:

��

(1) Adjusted forThe MOCC elected not to make any adjustments to the 2019 Plan design or the stock option awards granted to the Company’s executive officers, despite the impact of the three-for-oneCOVID-19 stock split completed December 27, 2017.pandemic on the global economy.

25

Graco Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement

Compensation of Individual Named Executive Officers

Patrick J. McHale

President and Chief Executive Officer

Mr. McHale’s base salary as of December 20162019 was below the median of the 20162019 Willis Towers Watson survey data. In December 2016,2019, the MOCC approved a base salary increase of 2.5%3% to $792,200$866,200 for 20172020 based on Mr. McHale’s relative position in the market and individual performance. The increase was in line with the Market Increase Projection. Based on 20172020 corporate net sales and corporate AdjustedIncentive EPS performance, Mr. McHale received a $1,188,300$687,823 bonus payout under the Incentive Bonus Plan. Mr. McHale’s bonus payout represented 150%79% of his target award. Based on the process described above for setting long-term incentive awards, Mr. McHale received a stock option award of 488,094441,410 shares in February 2017.2020.

Christian E. RotheMark W. Sheahan

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Mr. Rothe’sSheahan’s base salary as of December 20162019 was below the median of the 20162019 Willis Towers Watson survey data. In December 2016,2019, the MOCC approved a base salary increase of 6%7% to $397,710$449,400 for 20172020 based on Mr. Rothe’sSheahan’s relative position in the market and individual performance. Based on 20172020 corporate net sales and corporate AdjustedIncentive EPS performance, Mr. RotheSheahan received a $417,596$249,798 bonus payment under the Incentive Bonus Plan. Mr. Rothe’sSheahan’s bonus payout represented 150%79% of his target award. Based on the process described above for setting long-term incentive awards, Mr. RotheSheahan received a stock option award of 65,76060,190 shares in February 2017.2020.

Dale D. Johnson

President, Worldwide Contractor Equipment Division

Mr. Johnson’s base salary as of December 20162019 was above the median of the 20162019 Willis Towers Watson survey data. His highly competitive base compensation is based on key factors such as long tenure, strong past performance and individual contributions to the Company. In December 2016,2019, the MOCC approved a 4% increase to Mr. Johnson’s base salary to $396,000$494,000 for 20172020 based on individual performance and internal pay relationships. Based on 2020 corporate net sales, corporate Incentive EPS, worldwide Contractor Equipment Division net sales, and worldwide Contractor Equipment Division Incentive EPS performance, Mr. Johnson received a $396,645 cash bonus payout under the Incentive Bonus Plan. Mr. Johnson’s bonus payout represented 115% of his target award. Based on the process described above for setting long-term incentive awards, Mr. Johnson

26

Graco Inc. 2021 Proxy Statement

received a stock option award of 42,130 shares in February 2020.

Christian E. Rothe

President, Worldwide Applied Fluid Technologies Division

Mr. Rothe’s base salary as of December 2019 was above the median of the 2019 Willis Towers Watson survey data. In December 2019, the MOCC approved a 3% increase to Mr. Rothe’s base salary to $485,200 for 2020 based on his relative position in the market and individual performance. Based on 20172020 corporate net sales, corporate AdjustedIncentive EPS, worldwide Contractor EquipmentApplied Fluid Technologies Division net sales, and worldwide Contractor EquipmentApplied Fluid Technologies Division AdjustedIncentive EPS performance, Mr. Rothe received a $197,741 bonus payout under the Incentive Bonus Plan. Mr. Rothe’s bonus payout represented 58% of his target award. Based on the process described above for setting long-term incentive awards, Mr. Rothe received a stock option award of 40,120 shares in February 2020.

Jeffrey P. Johnson

President, Electric Motor Division

Mr. Johnson’s base salary as of December 2019 was above the median of the 2019 Willis Towers Watson survey data. In December 2019, the MOCC approved a base salary increase of 3% to $377,804 for 2020 based on Mr. Johnson’s relative position in the market and individual performance. Based on 2020 corporate net sales and corporate Incentive EPS, Mr. Johnson received a $415,800 cash$210,002 bonus payoutpayment under the Incentive Bonus Plan. Mr. Johnson’s bonus payout represented 150%79% of his target award. Based on the process described above for setting long-term incentive awards, Mr. Johnson received a stock option award of 52,62038,120 shares in February 2017.

Mark W. Sheahan

Vice President and General Manager, Applied Fluid Technologies Division

Mr. Sheahan’s base salary as of December 2016 was above the median of the 2016 Willis Towers Watson survey data. In December 2016, the MOCC approved a 5% increase to Mr. Sheahan’s base salary to $358,500 for 2017 based on his relative position in the market and individual performance. Based on 2017 corporate net sales, corporate Adjusted EPS, worldwide Applied Fluid Technologies Division net sales, and worldwide Applied Fluid Technologies Division Adjusted EPS performance, Mr. Sheahan received a $376,425 bonus payout under the Incentive Bonus Plan. Mr. Sheahan’s bonus payout represented 150% of his target award. Based on the process described above for setting long-term incentive awards, Mr. Sheahan received a stock option award of 52,620 shares in February 2017.

Jeffrey P. Johnson

Vice President and General Manager, EMEA

Mr. Johnson’s base salary as of December 2016 was at approximately the median of the 2016 Willis Towers Watson survey data. In December 2016, the MOCC approved a 4% increase to Mr. Johnson’s base salary to $342,400 for 2017 based on his relative position in the market and individual performance. Based on 2017 corporate net sales, corporate Adjusted EPS, worldwide EMEA net sales, and worldwide EMEA Adjusted EPS performance, Mr. Johnson received a $359,520 bonus payout under the Incentive Bonus Plan. Mr. Johnson’s bonus payout represents 150% of his target award. Based on the process described above for setting long-term incentive awards, Mr. Johnson received a stock option award of 52,620 shares in February 2017.2020.

Compensation Decisions for 20182021

In December of 2017,2020, the MOCC increased the base salaries of each of the NEOs between 3% and 15%10% effective January 1, 2018.2021. At its February 20182021 meeting, the MOCC kept each NEO’s target annual cash incentive payout as a percent of base salary the same for 2018,2021, and granted under the 20152019 Plan stock option awards of 351,83050,960 shares to Mr. McHale, 54,730 shares to Mr.

26

Graco Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement

Rothe, 35,180Sheahan, 32,550 shares to Mr. D. Johnson, 35,18028,310 shares to Mr. Sheahan,Rothe, and 33,22028,310 shares to Mr. J. Johnson. The MOCC did not grant a stock option award to Mr. McHale due to his impending retirement. On February 26, 2021, the MOCC granted an award of 25,000 restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to Mr. D. Johnson for retention purposes in light of the transition in leadership of the Company. The RSUs will vest in full on December 31, 2024, subject to Mr. Johnson’s continued employment through that date. If Mr. D. Johnson’s employment terminates for any reason other than death, disability or termination by the Company without cause, all RSUs will be forfeited. In the event of Mr. D. Johnson’s death or disability, termination of employment by the Company without cause, or a change of control, all unvested RSUs will vest immediately. Upon vesting, the RSUs will be settled by issuing 25,000 shares of common stock to Mr. D. Johnson.

Benefits and Perquisites

In an effort to attract and retain talented employees, we offer retirement, health and welfare programs competitive within our local markets (the “Benefit Programs”). The only Benefit Programs offered to our U.S. executive officers, either exclusively or with terms different from those offered to other eligible employees, are the following:

27

Graco Inc. 2021 Proxy Statement

Severance and Change of Control Arrangements

We have entered into Key Employee Agreements with the CEO and each of the other NEOs, the terms of which are described below under “Change of Control and Post-Termination Payments.” The MOCC believes it is in the best interests of our Company and its shareholders to design compensation programs that:

Accordingly, the agreements generally provide for certain benefits if the executive officer’s employment or service is involuntarily terminated by our Company without cause prior to a change of control or if, within two years after a change of control, the executive officer’s employment or service is terminated involuntarily by the Company without cause or the executive officer resigns for good reason. The current form of Key Employee Agreement was approved by the MOCC in December 2007 after reviewing the Key Employee Agreements previously in effect and current market practices related to severance arrangements and benefit levels related thereto. The MOCC reviews the form of Key Employee Agreement on a periodic basis in consultation with the executive compensation consultant and legal advisors.

The MOCC believes it is imperative to diminish any potential distraction of the executive officers by the personal uncertainties and risks created by a pending or threatened change of control. By offering an agreement that will financially protect the executive officer in the event his or her employment or service is involuntarily terminated or terminated by the executive officer for good reason following a change of control, the MOCC believes each executive officer’s full attention and dedication to our Company will be enhanced. The MOCC also believes the officers’ dedication will help the Company appropriately evaluate and complete a change of control transaction, and facilitate an orderly transition. In the event of a change of control of our Company,

27

Graco Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement

the agreements provide benefits only if the executive officer’s employment or service is terminated involuntarily without cause or if the executive officer resigns for good reason, including by reason of material demotion, decrease in compensation, relocation or increased travel, within two years after the change of control. The MOCC believes this “double-trigger” approach is most consistent with the objectives described above. The MOCC believes a termination by an executive officer for good reason may be conceptually the same as termination by our Company without cause, and that a potential acquirer would otherwise have an incentive to constructively terminate the executive’s employment to avoid paying severance benefits. Thus, the Key Employee Agreements provide severance benefits in the case of resignation for good reason following a change of control.

The MOCC believes it is important to attract and retain our executive officers by agreeing to provide certain benefits if the executive officer’s employment or service is terminated without cause prior to a change of control. In addition, the MOCC believes these benefits are appropriate to compensate these executive officers for agreeing not to work with competitors for a specified period of time following termination of employment, and that compensation enhances the enforceability of thesenon-compete covenants. The MOCC also believes the Company benefits from obtaining a release of any claims from these former executive officers and the severance payments provide consideration for obtaining the release.

Our equity awards for executive officers and certain key managers provide for accelerated vesting or lapse of restrictions upon a change of control. The MOCC believes that acceleration upon a change of control is appropriate to minimize the risk that executive officers might favor a transaction based on the likely impact on the executive officers’ equity awards, to increase the likelihood that the employees will remain with us after becoming aware of a pending or threatened change of control, and due to the increased likelihood that employees may be terminated by a successor through no fault of their own.

Hedging and Pledging

The Company’s directors, and executive officers and certain employees who may have access and exposure to information about the Company’s financial performance prior to it being released to the public are prohibited from hedging Company stock.

The Company’s directors and executive officers are also prohibited from pledgingmay pledge Company stock, without first obtaining the proper levelbut only in very limited circumstances. We believe

28

Graco Inc. 2021 Proxy Statement

our shareholders benefit when our directors and executive officers have “skin-in-the-game” and are encouraged to both purchase Company stock out of approval. Anytheir own pockets and to retain shares they have been granted, and that a blanket policy prohibiting pledging may discourage our directors and executive officers from doing either. Therefore, any pledges of Company stock by a director or an executive officer (other than the CEO or the General Counsel) must be approved in advance by the CEO and the General Counsel in consultation with the Chair of the Governance Committee. Any pledges of Company stock by the CEO or the General Counsel must be approved in advance by the Governance Committee. All approvals of pledges of Company stock, if granted, will be on a discretionary basis, considering the following criteria:

We believe the limitations on pledging set forth above are carefully crafted to help ensure that the benefits of stock ownership by our directors and executive officers outweigh any potential risks that may be associated with pledging.

During 2017,2020, there were no Company shares pledged or hedged by directors or executive officers.

Tax Implications of Executive Compensation

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code places a limit of $1 million in compensation per year on the amount public companies may deduct with respect to certain executive officers. On December 22, 2017,Our pay-for-performance philosophy is central to our compensation program, and the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”) was signed into law. The Act significantly changes the executive compensation deduction rules of Section 162(m). Prior to the Act, the $1 million limitation did not apply to compensation that qualified as “performance-based compensation.” Annual cash incentives meeting certain conditions and stock option awards constituted performance-based compensation and were generally fully deductible. However, the Act repealed the performance-based compensation exception to the $1 million deduction limitation for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, such that compensation paid to executive officers in excess of $1 million will not be deductible unless it qualifies for transition relief applicable to certain arrangements in effect as of November 2, 2017, which are not materially modified after that date. The MOCC continues to believe thatbelieves shareholder interests are best served if its discretion and flexibility in structuring and awarding compensation is not restricted even though some compensation awards may have resulted in the past, and are expected to result in the future, innon-deductible compensation expensesexpense to the

28

Graco Inc. 2018 Proxy Statement

Company.

Report of the Management Organization and Compensation Committee

The Management Organization and Compensation Committee of the Company has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of RegulationS-K with management, and based on such review and discussions, the Management Organization and Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

The Members of the Management Organization and Compensation Committee

29

Graco Inc. 20182021 Proxy Statement

Summary Compensation Table

The table below summarizes the total compensation for the last three fiscal years awarded to, earned by or paid to or earned byindividuals who served as our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer during fiscal year 2020 and each of the other three most highly compensated Named Executive Officers duringwho were serving as executive officers at the end of fiscal years ended December 29, 2017, December 30, 2016 and December 25, 2015.year 2020.

The Other Perquisites consist of Company-provided incremental cost for long-term disability coverage, financial planning, spousal travel, miscellaneous travel and an executive physical. None of these individual perquisite categories exceeded the greater of $25,000 or 10% of the total perquisite amount.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 20172020

On February 17, 2017,14, 2020, the MOCC awarded anon-qualified stock option to each executive officer, including the NEOs, under the Graco Inc. 20152019 Stock Incentive Plan. The amounts shown in the table below in the column entitled “All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options” reflect the number of common shares covered by the stock option granted to each NEO. Each option has a10-year term and becomes exercisable in equal installments over four years, beginning with the first anniversary of the grant date.

Under the Incentive Bonus Plan, the payout upon achievement of applicable financial measures ranges from a minimum of 0% to a maximum of 150% of base salary for Mr. McHale and a minimum of 0% to a maximum of 105% of base salary for the other NEOs.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year EndingEnded December 29, 201725, 2020